We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Power Admin PA File Sight based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."The indexes allow you to get your results quickly. The filtering and log passing is the advantage of Logstash."
"Elastic Security is very customizable, and the dashboards are very easy to build."
"The most valuable feature is the machine learning capability."
"The solution is compatible with the cloud-native environment and they can adapt to it faster."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability. We are in Indonesia, more engineers understand Elastic Security here. So it is easier to scale and also develop. In features, the discovery to query all the logs is very important to us. It is very easy, especially with the query function and the feature to generate alerts and create tools. Sometimes we use the alert security dashboard to monitor our clients."
"It's a good platform and the very best in the current market. We looked at the Forester report from December 2022 where it was said to be a leader."
"The intelligence of the system has been very impressive. It's not quite AI, but the technical bit where it correlates information, based on the seen attacks within an organization is good."
"The most valuable feature is the speed, as it responds in a very short time."
"The customers who have the use case of monitoring the file server and want to know the user's activity. It's the Power Admin's requirement."
"Elastic Security can be a bit difficult to use if a person only has experience in SMBs with tools like Zoho. The product can also be difficult for those who have never dealt with query language."
"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."
"They don't provide user authentication and authorisation features (Shield) as a part of their open-source version."
"There is room for improvement in the Kibana dashboard and in the asset management for the program."
"It's a little bit of a learning curve to understand the logic of searching for things and trying to find what you're looking for in Elastic Security."
"In terms of improvement, there could be more automation in responding to and evaluating detections."
"I would like the process of retrieving archived data and viewing it in Kibana to be simplified."
"Their visuals and graphs need to be better."
"The setup takes half an hour. It will be a little complex."
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews while Power Admin PA File Sight is ranked 39th in Log Management with 1 review. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Power Admin PA File Sight is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Power Admin PA File Sight writes "Good stability and preferred choice for DLP needs over other solutions". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, whereas Power Admin PA File Sight is most compared with .
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
