Elastifile vs Oracle ZFS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Elastifile Logo
53 views|52 comparisons
Oracle Logo
1,070 views|801 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File System Software solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:It is not necessarily for the fastest storage or cluster storage, but just for pure storage, it's really hard to beat. It's just been around as long as anything else.
Top Answer:The question is, can it do a lot better? So for example, it could run an airline, and all the computer systems, but can it do it as effectively and efficiently as it could on other systems? No. That's… more »
Top Answer:My company is a team of developers and system integrators and we build cloud services for companies so they can pull stuff back from Google and Microsoft in-house to make it more efficient and use the… more »
Ranking
11th
Views
53
Comparisons
52
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
3rd
Views
1,070
Comparisons
801
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
622
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
WekaFS logo
Compared 83% of the time.
Amazon FSx logo
Compared 8% of the time.
Cohesity SpanFS logo
Compared 6% of the time.
DDN EXA5 logo
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
ZFS
Learn More
Overview

Elastifile provides the first-ever hybrid cloud data infrastructure, enabling unprecedented consolidation and self-service workflows across private and public clouds. Your application, analytics, and infrastructure teams can manage data across complex workflows with the simplicity and control of a single global namespace. All this is enabled by the Elastifile Cloud File System–a breakthrough application-level distributed file/object system. This elastic, scale-out software-defined solution brings

Combining the availability and data services of enterprise storage with the agility, multi-tenancy and cost-efficiency of webscale architecture, Elastifile delivers flash performance to any and all consolidated workloads, dramatically reducing CAPEX and OPEX for enterprises and service providers.

Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance delivers leading performance and superior efficiency in enterprise-class network-attached storage (NAS) environments, accelerating business functions, and reducing complexity. This first application-engineered storage system provides unique integration points with Oracle Database which automate storage tuning and data lifecycle management, reduce capacity requirements, and lower TCO.

Sample Customers
Banca Intesa SanPaolo, eww ITandTEL, eww ag, Corner4, Linfosys, sigmavista it consulting, Rideau
Specialized Bicycle Components Inc., Hospital AlemÊo Oswaldo Cruz, DB Schenker Rail, Asia Commercial Bank, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, Ricoh Company Ltd., CyberSolutions Inc., NARA INSTITUTE of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY, SunGard Availability Services, B&H PhotoVideo,
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Government14%
Financial Services Firm12%
Computer Software Company10%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise65%

Elastifile is ranked 11th in File System Software while Oracle ZFS is ranked 3rd in File System Software with 5 reviews. Elastifile is rated 0.0, while Oracle ZFS is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle ZFS writes "Great for box storage; falls flat if you need fast storage". Elastifile is most compared with WekaFS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, IBM Spectrum Scale and NetApp AFF, whereas Oracle ZFS is most compared with WekaFS, Amazon FSx, Cohesity SpanFS and DDN EXA5.

See our list of best File System Software vendors.

We monitor all File System Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.