Ellucian vs SITS: Vision comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ellucian Logo
34 views|28 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Tribal Group Logo
27 views|13 comparisons
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
34
Comparisons
28
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
27
Comparisons
13
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Datatel
Learn More
Tribal Group
Video Not Available
Overview
A range of campus management solutions for higher education sector including student information system, registration tools, and more.

SITS:Vision is specifically designed for higher education providers like you to manage and improve every aspect of the student journey.
Use SITS:Vision to transform the way staff collect, collate, analyse, share and act on information to deliver the best experience for every student across your university and help them achieve their learning outcomes.

Sample Customers
Oklahoma Christian University
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
University30%
Educational Organization18%
Computer Software Company13%
Government8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise63%
No Data Available

Ellucian is ranked 4th in Student Information System (SIS) while SITS: Vision is ranked 7th in Student Information System (SIS). Ellucian is rated 8.0, while SITS: Vision is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Ellucian writes "Presents all information in one place and automates some of our manual processes". On the other hand, Ellucian is most compared with PeopleSoft, SAP ERP and Jenzabar JICS, whereas SITS: Vision is most compared with .

See our list of best Student Information System (SIS) vendors.

We monitor all Student Information System (SIS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.