• Home
  • Celerra [EOL] vs. LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways

Celerra [EOL] vs LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo
Celerra [EOL]
Read 1 Celerra [EOL] review
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
LSI Logo
LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways
111 views|83 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Celerra [EOL] and LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Highly scalable and reliable SAN with fiber channel connectivity but bulky in size and consumes a lot of power
Use LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways?
Ranking
Unranked
In NAS
21st
out of 27 in NAS
Views
111
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Celerra
ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways
Learn More
Dell Technologies
LSI
Video Not Available
Overview
Each Celerra unified product is a dedicated network server optimized for file and block access, delivering high-end features in a scalable, easy-to-use package. For the ultimate in scalability, the Celerra unified storage platforms leverage both the innovative best-in-class EMC Fibre Channel RAID storage and deliver industry-leading EMC Celerra availability, performance, and ease of management. Celerra unified storage systems deliver a single-box block and file solution offering a centralized point of management for distributed environments.

ONStor 3000 Series NAS gateway lets you consolidate your unstructured data under a single file management framework over SAN storage of your choice. ONStor 3000 is interoperable with a broad range of enterprise SAN storage arrays from multiple vendors delivering investment protection of your existing storage assets.

Sample Customers
Wentworth-Douglas Hospital, Kindred Healthcare, Cosentry, Sumitomo Life Insurance Company, Shriners, BZWBK
University of California Santa Barbara, Mott Community College
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Celerra [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways is ranked 21st in NAS. Celerra [EOL] is rated 8.0, while LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Celerra [EOL] writes "Highly scalable and reliable SAN with fiber channel connectivity but bulky in size and consumes a lot of power". On the other hand, Celerra [EOL] is most compared with , whereas LSI ONStor Clustered NAS Gateways is most compared with .

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.