• Home
  • Multi-Path File System [EOL] vs. NetApp V-Series [EOL]

Multi-Path File System [EOL] vs NetApp V-Series [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Multi-Path File System [EOL] and NetApp V-Series [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Multi-Path File System [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Connects third-party storage to back end with all NetApp functionalities available
It enables us to protect the investment. We had existing arrays (EMC VMAX) and we reuse the free disk space, and use NetApp functionalities.
Ranking
Unranked
In NAS
Unranked
In NAS
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Multi-Path File System
Learn More
Dell Technologies
NetApp
Video Not Available
Overview

EMC Multi-Path File System enables data access at channel speeds, reduces network traffic, improves server performance, enhances Celerra Network Server performance and system scalability, and allows file sharing among heterogeneous clients.

NetApp V-Series storage virtualization controllers provide leading data protection, data management, and storage efficiency for your existing EMC, HDS, HP, IBM, Fujitsu, and NetApp E-Series storage arrays. Reclaim 35% or more capacity and reduce what you must spend for new disk drives to handle data growth by using NetApp storage efficiency features such as deduplication, thin provisioning, and compression. Optimize your workload performance with our broad flash portfolio.
Sample Customers
Los Alamos National Laboratory
City of Houston, Health Choice Network, SVC Bank, Plex Systems, Larsen & Toubro, IWD, JCVI
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Multi-Path File System [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while NetApp V-Series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS. Multi-Path File System [EOL] is rated 0.0, while NetApp V-Series [EOL] is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp V-Series [EOL] writes "Connects third-party storage to back end with all NetApp functionalities available". Multi-Path File System [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NetApp V-Series [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.