Compare EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 6th in Data Replication with 2 reviews while Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor is ranked 13th in Data Replication. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is rated 8.0, while Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor is rated 0. The top reviewer of EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "A well priced, stable solution that doesn't use too much bandwidth ". On the other hand, EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp SnapMirror and Symmetrix Remote Data Facility, whereas Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor is most compared with Symmetrix Remote Data Facility.

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication

Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication

Read 2 EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication reviews.

1,333 views|841 comparisons

Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

77 views|50 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

RahmiAtıcı

Bussiness Development Manager

It has improved RTO and RPO

I worked as an IT manager and IT consultant. I have had many experiences with EMC and RecoverPoint. It has improved RTO and RPO.

Use Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about HVR Software, NetApp, JumpMind and others in Data Replication. Updated: October 2019.

Download now

372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th out of 19 in Data Replication Views 1,333 Comparisons 841 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 213 Avg. Rating 8.0	13th out of 19 in Data Replication Views 77 Comparisons 50 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Avg. Rating N/A
Top Comparisons
EMC AppSync vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 31% of the time. NetApp SnapMirror vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 17% of the time. Symmetrix Remote Data Facility vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 16% of the time. See more EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication competitors » + Add more products to compare	Symmetrix Remote Data Facility vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Compared 100% of the time. See more Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication	HiCommand Replication Monitor
Learn
Dell EMC	Hitachi
Overview
EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.	With a single, easy-to-use display for monitoring and visualizing volume replication configurations and status information, Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor software simplifies administration of the entire suite of Hitachi replication products for open systems environments.
Offer
Learn more about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Learn More	Learn more about Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Learn More
Sample Customers
Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit	Credit Union Australia (CUA)

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about HVR Software, NetApp, JumpMind and others in Data Replication. Updated: October 2019.

Download now

372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.