EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 2 reviews vs Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor which is ranked 12th in Data Replication. The top reviewer of EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp SnapMirror and IBM Softek TDMF. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror, Symmetrix Remote Data Facility and HVR Software.

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication

Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

18139

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication

Based on 2 reviews.

20324

Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

Most Helpful Review

RahmiAtıcı

Bussiness Development Manager

It has improved RTO and RPO

I worked as an IT manager and IT consultant. I have had many experiences with EMC and RecoverPoint. It has improved RTO and RPO.

Use Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor? Share your opinion.

Have A Question About Data Replication?

Our experts can help. 270,274 professionals have used our research on 6,265 solutions.

Quotes From Members Comparing EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Have A Question About Data Replication? Our experts can help. 270,274 professionals have used our research on 6,265 solutions. Ask a question
Ranking
RANKING	2nd out of 13 In Data Replication Views 2,892 Comparisons 1,482 Reviews 2 Followers 207 Avg. Rating 8.5	12th out of 13 In Data Replication Views 124 Comparisons 86 Reviews 0 Followers 135 Avg. Rating N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	EMC AppSync vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 29% of the time. NetApp SnapMirror vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 24% of the time. IBM Softek TDMF vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 11% of the time. See more EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication competitors »	NetApp SnapMirror vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Compared 28% of the time. Symmetrix Remote Data Facility vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Compared 23% of the time. HVR Software vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Compared 15% of the time. See more Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As	RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication	HiCommand Replication Monitor
Website/Video
Website/Video	Dell EMC	Hitachi
Overview
Overview	EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.	With a single, easy-to-use display for monitoring and visualizing volume replication configurations and status information, Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor software simplifies administration of the entire suite of Hitachi replication products for open systems environments.
OFFER
Learn more about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Learn More	Learn more about Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit	Credit Union Australia (CUA)

Have A Question About Data Replication?

Our experts can help. 270,274 professionals have used our research on 6,265 solutions.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.