EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 2 reviews vs Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor which is ranked 13th in Data Replication. The top reviewer of EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication writes "Enables the rolling back of volume states to a point in time". EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication is most compared with EMC AppSync, NetApp SnapMirror and IBM Softek TDMF. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror, Symmetrix Remote Data Facility and HVR Software.

18139

EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication

Based on 2 reviews.

20324

Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

32614

Null Product

Most Helpful Review

RahmiAtıcı

Bussiness Development Manager

It has improved RTO and RPO

I worked as an IT manager and IT consultant. I have had many experiences with EMC and RecoverPoint. It has improved RTO and RPO.

Use Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor? Share your opinion.

Use Null Product? Share your opinion.

Have A Question About Data Replication?

Our experts can help. 300,473 professionals have used our research on 6,714 solutions.

Quotes From Members Comparing EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 300,473 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd out of 16 In Data Replication Views 3,188 Comparisons 1,117 Reviews 2 Followers 121 Avg. Rating 8.5	13th out of 16 In Data Replication Views 144 Comparisons 74 Reviews 0 Followers 69 Avg. Rating N/A	1st out of 206 In Emerging Solutions Views 0 Comparisons 0 Reviews 1 Followers 1 Avg. Rating 5.0
Top Comparisons
EMC AppSync vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 33% of the time. NetApp SnapMirror vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 27% of the time. IBM Softek TDMF vs. EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Compared 12% of the time. See more EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication competitors »	NetApp SnapMirror vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Compared 44% of the time. Symmetrix Remote Data Facility vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Compared 34% of the time. HVR Software vs. Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Compared 22% of the time. See more Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor competitors »	Veeam Backup & Replication vs. Null Product Compared 53% of the time. Zerto Virtual Replication vs. Null Product Compared 47% of the time.
Also Known As
RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication	HiCommand Replication Monitor
Website/Video
Dell EMC	Hitachi	Null Vendor
Overview
EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.	With a single, easy-to-use display for monitoring and visualizing volume replication configurations and status information, Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor software simplifies administration of the entire suite of Hitachi replication products for open systems environments.	Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication Learn More	Learn more about Hitachi HiCommand Replication Monitor Learn More	Learn more about Null Product Learn More
Sample Customers
Regis Aged Care, Cap Atlantique, Lewisville Independent School District, EnvisionRxOptions, Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, Major Boutique Hotel Chain, Riverside Health System, Panduit	Credit Union Australia (CUA)	Information Not Available

Have A Question About Data Replication?

Our experts can help. 300,473 professionals have used our research on 6,714 solutions.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.