Compare Planview Enterprise One vs. erwin Enterprise Architecture

erwin Enterprise Architecture is ranked 6th in Architecture Management with 4 reviews while Planview Enterprise One is ranked 5th in Architecture Management with 30 reviews. erwin Enterprise Architecture is rated 7.2, while Planview Enterprise One is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of erwin Enterprise Architecture writes "Offers clarity about our data and is scalable with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Planview Enterprise One writes "Organizes work, provides visibility and accountability". erwin Enterprise Architecture is most compared with IDERA ER/Studio, SAP PowerDesigner and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas Planview Enterprise One is most compared with CA Clarity PPM, Planview PPM Pro and Microsoft Project Server. See our Planview Enterprise One vs. erwin Enterprise Architecture report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Enterprise One vs. erwin Enterprise Architecture and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The ability to share and collaborate on the solution is its most valuable feature.The initial setup was really straightforward and the deployment was done within one day.Forward and reverse engineering were valuable features.Support for a broad range of data sources from relational to big data to the Cloud.

Read more »

The most valuable feature for me is the ease and customizability of reporting.The most valuable feature of this solution is the completeness of the standard, underlying metamodel.It gives us the vast ability to churn out-of-the-box reports and have an overview about approach rates and resource utilization.The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.The integration stuff from tool to tool, like Projectplace to Planview, to manage projects is the most valuable feature. It keeps all our tasks up-to-date. It closely follows up with everything, which is really cool.The most valuable features are the resource management, the time sheet entry and usage, and the financial planning. With our projects, we primarily focus on resource assignments, as far as determining the actual forecast and actuals of our projects. A lot of it is based off of the resources utilized on those projects. The time based helps us capture the actuals. The amount of time people are spending on working on their project tasks. Because they've built this into the schedule, so we can build the forecast. With financial planning, we're able to look back on what our variance is and if there is anything between the scheduled forecasted hours, dollars against the actual hours, and the costs that they utilize.Our reporting is much better. There is much more visibility on projects, schedules, tasks, and in our milestones. Now, we have a consistent way of reporting out to the committees and getting all of our schedules and milestones.It has been effective for our delivery. It's given us much better visibility into what is being delivered and when.

Read more »

Cons
The solution needs to focus on allowing for more integrations.I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution.Business process modelling could be improved.There might be improvement required to better support some of the MPP databases for non-relational data structures and NoSQL databases.

Read more »

I would like to be able to integrate with Oracle to supplement what we're currently doing with reporting.Configuring the UI in the content management system is too elaborate and too time-consuming.The UI needs improvement. The UI should have more possibilities for users who are not specialized in using Planview. At the moment, it is more of a technical UI. I would like it to be an open user UI.Some of the out-of-the-box reporting is not immediately useful and although it can be configured or customized, there are still improvements that can be made.We had issues with the data rephrasing.I would like a bit more flexibility, as far as the configuration, and have additional capabilities to configure, making it more flexible for our use.Sometimes within the application, when you pull a report, it takes awhile performance-wise for the reports to pull up.We do have some significant issues with our integrations that we're working through. Those are not as stable or reliable as what we would like.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Our licensing fees are approximately $50,000 USD annually.With the costs, they were very understanding. Knowing that we were an existing customer, they were very much willing to work with us to make sure that we were able to transition to Enterprise One from PPM Pro.We recently did a new bundle for all of Enterprise One. It includes some of the newer pieces, like Projectplace and LeanKit. It bundled our CTM in with it as well. I think the total came out to be about $900,000 a year. This is for unlimited licenses.In the time that I've used it, we've doubled up the amount of dollars on our intended projects.I think all in we are at $33,000 a year and that includes Projectplace and Planview. We used to have the integration to JIRA, but we don't pay for that anymore.Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total.I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen.We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
377,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
Views
5,793
Comparisons
4,426
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
197
Avg. Rating
7.3
5th
Views
3,753
Comparisons
2,249
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
1,174
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
erwin EATroux
Learn
erwin
Planview
Overview

erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

Planview Enterprise, Planview's performance management platform, combines project and portfolio management software with adaptive best practices. By integrating the business process management of strategies, services, and projects within a single, Web-based solution, Planview empowers organizations to achieve greater levels of control over their ever-changing environment by dynamically managing money, resources, and capacities.
Offer
Learn more about erwin Enterprise Architecture
Learn more about Planview Enterprise One
Sample Customers
AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.Zurich Insurance Group, Zumbotel Group, Carphone Warehouse
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company34%
Insurance Company11%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Insurance Company22%
Healthcare Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company10%
Government10%
Retailer10%
Software R&D Company10%
Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Enterprise One vs. erwin Enterprise Architecture and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email