We compared ExtremeRouting and Juniper MX Series Routers across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: ExtremeRouting is praised for its simple and easy setup process, while the initial setup for Juniper MX Series Routers can vary. ExtremeRouting offers valuable features like extreme stacking and FabricOS, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers are highly regarded for their security, ease of use, flexibility, reliability, and performance. ExtremeRouting could benefit from incorporating the latest protocols and has subpar customer service. On the other hand, Juniper MX Series Routers could improve through better training and enhancements in reliability and functionality. Both products have reasonable pricing, with Juniper MX Series Routers being considered less expensive than some competitors.
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Provides a good redundancy technique."
"Looking at the robustness, I do not know whether it would be carrier grade – let's say for hundreds of thousands of users – but it certainly doesn't balk at 10,000 users or less."
"What I like about Extreme Routing is its impressive performance."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It is very easy to set up."
"The routing protocol is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"The solution's main features are its security and ease of use."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers has a CLR and it's more reliable and faster than others."
"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."
"The most valuable features for us were related to our transition into MPLS technology, specifically for BPN and VPN services."
"The stability of Juniper is better than Cisco's."
"The solution is quite stable. We've found it to be very good. There aren't bugs, glitches, or crashes."
"Juniper MX Series Routers are easy to configure and easy to back up."
"In our company, we are integrators who create solutions for our customers. I find Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches to be suitable as it allows for easy configuration and offers features like SNMP. Personally, I find it convenient to switch from Cisco to Juniper EX because of my experience with various vendors like Huawei and Cisco. It's easy for me to read configurations from Cisco and transfer them to Juniper. Mainly, we work with customers who want to change or upgrade their network infrastructure, moving from vendors like Cisco, Aruba, or Huawei to Juniper for modernization. Juniper's features are more advanced, and it helps us meet the diverse needs of our customers. My role involves helping with the deployment and configuration of switching, access points, and Wi-Fi, for building robust and modern networks."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"One area for improvement with Extreme Routing is the need for more accessible and comprehensive training."
"The support, software resiliency, and software stability are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"Some of the latest protocols are unavailable."
"My advice for those looking into ExtremeRouting is: right now all switch manufacturers are backed up for months. If you're looking to implement quickly, I would say shop around a bit because it might be difficult."
"It's not evolving as quickly as we would like it to."
"The solution is far too unstable. It's completely unreliable."
"The solution could improve by providing enhancements to built-in SDN or SDWAN."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
"Juniper have addressed issues with the MX204, but it still has a limited number of interfaces. Ideally, it should support up to twenty or twenty-four interfaces to better serve smaller service providers. Additionally, the MX304 doesn't support subscriber management, also known as BNG, which I believe should be included."
"The web interface can be improved."
"We'd like them to be capable of adding firewall options to the license."
"In terms of what could be improved, they could extend the software warranty to be for its lifetime, as well. At the moment, the software warranty is limited, I think to one year."
"There are areas for improvement in Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches. One aspect that could be enhanced is the pricing; many clients acknowledge the quality of Juniper switches but find the pricing challenging, especially when compared to competitors like Huawei. Additionally, from a feature perspective, there's a desire for improved clarity and ease of configuration in Juniper switches. Some users find it difficult to understand and configure certain aspects, necessitating the use of external tools. This complexity, especially for Internet service providers, can be a barrier. Addressing these concerns could further strengthen the position of Juniper switches in the market."
"The integration could be better."
ExtremeRouting is ranked 10th in Routers with 6 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. ExtremeRouting is rated 7.6, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ExtremeRouting writes "Efficient routing; good pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". ExtremeRouting is most compared with , whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch. See our ExtremeRouting vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.