• Home
  • F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) vs. FortiCache [EOL]

F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) vs FortiCache [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) and FortiCache [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL)?
Ibrahim Karaeesh
Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing is based on a yearly contract."

    • More FortiCache [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    Unranked
    In WAN Optimization
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Traffic Management Operating System
    Learn More
    F5
    Fortinet
    Overview
    F5 Traffic Management Operating System, a collection of real-time features and functions, purpose-built and designed as a full-proxy solution with the power and performance. F5 TMOS is a self-contained, real-time operating system that is the brain behind BIG-IP. Developed as the foundation for all of F5 products, each component within the system performs operations and then lets the next component run, greatly reducing the overhead of CPU scheduling.

    Today’s bandwidth requirements are out of control, consuming capacity as soon as it’s available. As users shift to mobile access and the volume of interactive and video content dramatically increases, it seems hard to keep up without adding a lot of expensive bandwidth. However, by reducing bandwidth demands and optimizing and accelerating the network, FortiCache caching appliances let you keep up with explosive bandwidth demand while delivering higher quality of service.

    Sample Customers
    TransUnion
    Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
    Buyer's Guide
    WAN Optimization
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while FortiCache [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is rated 0.0, while FortiCache [EOL] is rated 7.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of FortiCache [EOL] writes "Has high-availability for managing web caching, filtering and security through a user-friendly interface". F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is most compared with , whereas FortiCache [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

    We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.