F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) vs Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) and Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL)?
Rameshwer Sharma
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Traffic Management Operating System
Learn More
Overview
F5 Traffic Management Operating System, a collection of real-time features and functions, purpose-built and designed as a full-proxy solution with the power and performance. F5 TMOS is a self-contained, real-time operating system that is the brain behind BIG-IP. Developed as the foundation for all of F5 products, each component within the system performs operations and then lets the next component run, greatly reducing the overhead of CPU scheduling.

FortiWAN intelligently balances Internet and intranet traffic across multiple WAN connections to lower bandwidth costs and keep users connected. It offers easy-to-use multi-WAN management and a flexible policy-based performance management system.

Sample Customers
TransUnion
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization. F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is rated 0.0, while Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] writes "Easy to deploy with good connectivity and robustness for managing WAN links". F5 Traffic Management Operating System (EOL) is most compared with , whereas Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.