Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL]?
Anonymous User
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
479
Comparisons
393
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Learn More
Overview

Fabasoft app.telemetry is the tool of choice to ensure the availability and the response time behaviour of your application. Each http(s) request is logged together with the response times on the users’ devices as well as on the way the requests have taken through your hardware and software infrastructure.

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

Sample Customers
Upper Austria Economic Chamber (Wirtschaftskammer Oberösterreich), Bundesrechenzentrum
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company17%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise67%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 57th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Fabasoft app.telemetry [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Datadog.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.