FieldAware vs ServiceScheduling comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
FieldAware Logo
76 views|61 comparisons
ServicePower Logo
45 views|33 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FieldAware and ServiceScheduling based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Field Service Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
13th
Views
76
Comparisons
61
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
23rd
Views
45
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
ServicePower
Video Not Available
Overview
Our made-for-mobile, cloud-based software was designed from the ground up to provide ease-of-use with total flexibility. With FieldAware, you will amaze your customers, make your team more productive and stay ahead of your competition. Your business deserves the most powerful and easy to use field service management system available. Our software provided for a monthly subscription fee per user, with no up-front costs. Our SaaS product (Software as a Service) can be accessed from anywhere, at any time day or night, and handles your service delivery process from end-to-end. including: - Scheduling and Dispatching - Quotes and Jobs - Asset Management - Customer Relationship Management - Mobile Apps for Field Staff - Invoicing and Accounting Integration - Dashboards and Reporting
ServicePower's ServiceScheduling offers real-time schedule optimization technology and provides real time, unlimited, industry acknowledged route optimization using the latest algorithms. ServiceScheduling provides the wide range of features: Plan and forecast coverage using the latest map layering technology, Model configuration in non-production environment, Use a modern, hosted Management Console to oversee operations, Manage workforce skills-geography-shifts, Offer optimize appointments, schedule jobs with floating SLAs or lat/long coordinates, Access Optimization on Demand if full intra-day optimization is not desired, Fully mobilize field resources with ServiceMobility, Monitor scheduled jobs and handle exceptions through a real time Gantt interface, Track company assets and compare mobile status with ServiceGPS, Integrated IoT/M2M facilitates quick, automated response to outages and repairs, and more importantly, supports the transition to a proactive, maintenance scheduling model and Gather and analyze data, driving workforce efficiencies, and adjust operations to meet KPIs and customer satisfaction metrics through self-learning, in-memory ServiceStats
Sample Customers
Industrial Automation, Builder Security Group, ServiceMaster Clean for Vancouver, Cross Refrigeration, Sun Oil Limited, Accent Building Restoration Inc.
Mitsubishi Electric, ADT Security Services, Northern Ireland Electricity, ESI Enterprises, Richer Sounds, BrandsMart
Buyer's Guide
Field Service Management
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, IFS, Freshworks and others in Field Service Management. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FieldAware is ranked 13th in Field Service Management while ServiceScheduling is ranked 23rd in Field Service Management. FieldAware is rated 0.0, while ServiceScheduling is rated 0.0. On the other hand, FieldAware is most compared with , whereas ServiceScheduling is most compared with .

See our list of best Field Service Management vendors.

We monitor all Field Service Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.