• Home
  • FIS Profile [EOL] vs. MULTIVERSA IFP International Finance Portal

FIS Profile [EOL] vs MULTIVERSA IFP International Finance Portal comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Unranked
In Core Banking Software
Unranked
In Core Banking Software
Comparisons
Learn More
FIS
CoCoNet
Overview
Practice management and electronic medical record for general and specialist practice. Handles financials and appointments.

MULTIVERSA IFP combines the advantages of an out-of-the-box product, such as short time-to-market, cost transparency, cost savings, continuous product development, and years of practical experience.

The user interface design is based on the design guidelines of the issuing bank or corporate.

Sample Customers
A G Salmon & Co., A&O - Supermarket, A&P - Supermarket, A-C Holding B.V. - Vomar Voordeelmarkt - Supermarket, A. Espersen A/S - Headquarters, A.J.D. Tuna Ltd., A.P. Mller - Maersk A/S - Headquarters
Citi, ING, Unicredit, SEB, LBBW, Santander, Atos, Equens, JP Morgan, KBC, T Systems, VW, PostBank

FIS Profile [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Core Banking Software while MULTIVERSA IFP International Finance Portal doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Core Banking Software. FIS Profile [EOL] is rated 0.0, while MULTIVERSA IFP International Finance Portal is rated 0.0. On the other hand, FIS Profile [EOL] is most compared with , whereas MULTIVERSA IFP International Finance Portal is most compared with .

We monitor all Core Banking Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.