Compare FlexNet Code Insight vs. Sonatype Nexus Firewall

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Accurics Logo
110 views|43 comparisons
FlexNet Code Insight Logo
1,133 views|582 comparisons
Sonatype Nexus Firewall Logo
770 views|561 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonatype, Snyk, WhiteSource and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: February 2021.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Nexus Firewall
Learn More
Revenera
Video Not Available
Overview

At Accurics™, we envision a world where organizations can innovate in the cloud with confidence. Our mission is to enable cyber resilience through self-healing as organizations embrace cloud native infrastructure. The Accurics platform self-heals cloud native infrastructure by codifying security throughout the development lifecycle. It programmatically detects and resolves risks across Infrastructure as Code before infrastructure is provisioned, and maintains the secure posture in runtime by programmatically mitigating risks from changes. Accurics enables organizations of all sizes to achieve cloud cyber resilience through free cloud-based and open source tools such as Terrascan™.

FlexNet Code Insight is a single integrated solution for open source license compliance and security. Find vulnerabilities and remediate associated risk, while you build your products and during their lifecycle. Manage open source license compliance. And add automation to your processes and implement a formal OSS strategy and policy that balances business benefits and risk management.

Nexus Firewall is a perimeter quality control for software development. Similar to a network firewall, it leverages rules you define that automatically shield you from unacceptable software components entering and another set for stopping them from exiting your application development.

Offer
Learn more about Accurics
Learn more about FlexNet Code Insight
Learn more about Sonatype Nexus Firewall
Sample Customers
Automation Anywhere, NBA, GroundTruth, ServiceMax, Navis, Edcast
Information Not Available
EDF, Tomitribe, Crosskey, Blackboard, Travel audience
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm14%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company47%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company14%
Media Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonatype, Snyk, WhiteSource and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: February 2021.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FlexNet Code Insight is ranked 10th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 1 review while Sonatype Nexus Firewall is ranked 11th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). FlexNet Code Insight is rated 4.0, while Sonatype Nexus Firewall is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of FlexNet Code Insight writes "A decent web interface for reports, but the snippet style code matching requires too much effort". On the other hand, FlexNet Code Insight is most compared with WhiteSource, Black Duck and Veracode Software Composition Analysis, whereas Sonatype Nexus Firewall is most compared with JFrog Xray, Black Duck, Snyk, Veracode and Checkmarx.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.