• Home
  • Flux vs. Hypersocket MFT [EOL]

Flux vs Hypersocket MFT [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Flux Logo

Flux

Read 2 Flux reviews
87 views|73 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Hypersocket Software Logo

Hypersocket MFT [EOL]

views| comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Flux and Hypersocket MFT [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows.
Use Hypersocket MFT [EOL]?
Ranking
35th
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
87
Comparisons
73
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Flux
Hypersocket Software
Video Not Available
Overview

Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

Hypersocket MFT is a file transfer server that enables you to mount multiple external backend file systems into a single virtual file system and access this over a number of different secure protocols such as SFTP, FTPS, WebDAV, HTTPS or through our web-based browser.
Sample Customers
MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
Rexam, Citb, BCM, Ryder, Huawei, Ohio State University, Jacobs, Cisco, Xerox, Honeywell, Cofely Quentris, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS, Special Olympics
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company11%
Healthcare Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise81%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while Hypersocket MFT [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Flux is rated 10.0, while Hypersocket MFT [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". On the other hand, Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas Hypersocket MFT [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.