• Home
  • Flux vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Flux vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Flux Logo

Flux

Read 2 Flux reviews
82 views|72 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo

OpenText Cloud Service Automation

Read 6 OpenText Cloud Service Automation reviews
270 views|198 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Flux and OpenText Cloud Service Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows.
Anonymous User
Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."

    • More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?
    Top Answer:OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation?
    Top Answer:My organization uses the enterprise server solution, Micro Focus, on Azure. We are working on a project to migrate a mainframe code to the micro-enterprise developer on Azure, submitting our JCL jobs… more »
    Ranking
    35th
    out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    82
    Comparisons
    72
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    27th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    270
    Comparisons
    198
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation
    Learn More
    Flux
    OpenText
    Overview

    Flexible, integrated solution to meet highly complex processing needs with job scheduling, batch processor, and managed file transfer.

    Flux automates batch processes into comprehensive workflows. Flux's batch job scheduling runs reports, triggers database jobs, runs Java code, executes ETL processes, transfers files, and runs command lines or shell scripts. Flux integrates batch job scheduling, managed file transfer, database queries and stored procedures, web services, and error handling to automate your batch job scheduling needs.

    OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

    Sample Customers
    MetLife DHL Express The Clearing House Payments Company ADP Bank of New York Mellon Conway, Inc Carnegie Mellon University
    China Merchants Bank, Osiatis
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise81%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Flux is ranked 35th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews. Flux is rated 10.0, while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Flux writes "User-friendly, extensible product with great customer support. Would like better support for multiple workflows". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". Flux is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.