We performed a comparison between Fortify on Demand and Fortify Software Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST)."While using Micro Focus Fortify on Demand we have been very happy with the results and findings."
"Fortify on Demand is easy to use and the reporting is good."
"It is a very easy tool for developers to use in parallel while they're doing the coding. It does auto scanning as we are progressing with the CI/CD pipeline. It has got very simple and efficient API support."
"What stands out to me is the user-friendliness of each feature."
"I do not remember any issues with stability."
"It improves future security scans."
"The installation was easy."
"The static code analyzers are the most valuable features of this solution."
"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."
"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."
"Temenos's (T-24) info basic is a separate programming interface, and such proprietary platforms and programming interfaces were not easily supported by the out-of-the-box versions of Fortify."
"Not fully integrated with CIT processes."
"Takes up a lot of resources which can slow things down."
"There are many false positives identified by the solution."
"If you have a continuous integration in place, for example, and you want it to run along with your build and you want it to be fast, you're not going to get it. It adds to your development time."
"We want a user-based control and role-based access for developers. We want to give limited access to developers so that it only pertains to the code that they write and scanning of the codes for any vulnerabilities as they're progressing with writing the code. As of now, the interface to give restricted access to the developers is not the best. It gives them more access than what is basically required, but we don't want over-provisioning and over-access."
"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand could improve the user interface by making it more user-friendly."
"There's a bit of a learning curve. Our development team is struggling with following the rules and following the new processes."
"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."
"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."
More Fortify Software Security Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortify on Demand is ranked 9th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 56 reviews while Fortify Software Security Center is ranked 27th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 3 reviews. Fortify on Demand is rated 8.0, while Fortify Software Security Center is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Fortify on Demand writes "Provides good depth of scanning but is unfortunately not fully integrated with CIT processes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortify Software Security Center writes "A fair-priced solution that helps with application security testing ". Fortify on Demand is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Veracode, Coverity and Sonatype Lifecycle, whereas Fortify Software Security Center is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Fortify WebInspect and Checkmarx One.
See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.