Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] vs Ipanema IpIengine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Ipanema Technologies Logo
72 views|31 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] and Ipanema IpIengine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.
To learn more, read our detailed WAN Optimization Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In WAN Optimization
11th
out of 15 in WAN Optimization
Views
72
Comparisons
31
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IpIengine
Learn More
Ipanema Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

FortiWAN intelligently balances Internet and intranet traffic across multiple WAN connections to lower bandwidth costs and keep users connected. It offers easy-to-use multi-WAN management and a flexible policy-based performance management system.

The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

Sample Customers
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Buyer's Guide
WAN Optimization
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 11th in WAN Optimization. Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] writes "Easy to deploy with good connectivity and robustness for managing WAN links". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ipanema IpIengine writes "We like the Dynamic WAN selection and Dynamic QoS. It's important to select the right device at the start". Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with .

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.