• Home
  • Forum Systems Forum Sentry vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager

Forum Systems Forum Sentry vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
6th
out of 7 in SOA Application Gateways
Views
39
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
4th
out of 7 in SOA Application Gateways
Views
85
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Forum Sentry
ActiveMatrix Policy Manager
Learn More
Forum Systems
TIBCO
Overview
The Forum Sentry API gateway enables code-free, point-and-click building of APIs to integrate legacy and modern systems, connect cloud and mobile technologies, and extend business applications and services securely beyond the enterprise border.
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is a distributed, standards-based SOA policy solution that provides the definition, distribution, and enforcement of policies across heterogeneous Java-, .NET-, and J2EE-based services. Leveraging this integrated policy management console, SOA architects can declare policies and apply them to heterogeneous, distributed services in a consistent way.
Sample Customers
HAMBS, Vodafone, Synovus
Children's Hospital, Dell SecureWorks, Effiage, Lavego, Novo Nordisk, Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, U.S. Government Cyber Security, Vallourec

Forum Systems Forum Sentry is ranked 6th in SOA Application Gateways while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is ranked 4th in SOA Application Gateways. Forum Systems Forum Sentry is rated 0.0, while TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Forum Systems Forum Sentry is most compared with , whereas TIBCO ActiveMatrix Policy Manager is most compared with Actional Intermediary and Expressway Service Gateway.

See our list of best SOA Application Gateways vendors.

We monitor all SOA Application Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.