Compare FOSSA vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Accurics Logo
31 views|18 comparisons
FOSSA Logo
1,469 views|1,108 comparisons
Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle Logo
16,681 views|9,082 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Accurics? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about FOSSA vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"FOSSA is not cheap."

More FOSSA Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its pricing is competitive within the market. It's not very cheap, it's not very expensive.""We're pretty happy with the price, for what it is delivering for us and the value we're getting from it.""Pricing is comparable with some of the other products. We are happy with the pricing.""The price is good. We certainly get a lot more in return. However, it's also hard to get the funds to roll out such a product for the entire firm. Therefore, pricing has been a limiting factor for us. However, it's a fair price.""The license fee may be a bit harder for startups to justify. But it will save you a headache later as well as peace of mind. Additionally, it shows your own customers that you value security stuff and will protect yourselves from any licensing issues, which is good marketing too.""In addition to the license fee for IQ Server, you have to factor in some running costs. We use AWS, so we spun up an additional VM to run this. If the database is RDS that adds a little bit extra too. Of course someone could run it on a pre-existing VM or physical server to reduce costs. I should add that compared to the license fee, the running costs are so minimal they had no effect on our decision to use IQ Server.""Pricing is decent. It's not horrible. It's middle-of-the-road, as far as our ranking goes. They're a little bit more but that's also because they provide more.""Lifecycle, to the best of my recollection, had the best pricing compared with other solutions."

More Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The report part is quite easy to read. The report part is very important to us because that is how we communicate to our… more »
Top Answer: I'm not involved in the financial aspects, but I don't think it's overly expensive. We use the professional version… more »
Top Answer: One thing that I would like to give feedback on is to scan the binary code. It's very difficult to find. It's under… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 45% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
Nexus Lifecycle
Learn
Accurics
FOSSA
Video Not Available
Sonatype
Overview

At Accurics™, we envision a world where organizations can innovate in the cloud with confidence. Our mission is to enable cyber resilience through self-healing as organizations embrace cloud native infrastructure. The Accurics platform self-heals cloud native infrastructure by codifying security throughout the development lifecycle. It programmatically detects and resolves risks across Infrastructure as Code before infrastructure is provisioned, and maintains the secure posture in runtime by programmatically mitigating risks from changes. Accurics enables organizations of all sizes to achieve cloud cyber resilience through free cloud-based and open source tools such as Terrascan™.

Up to 90% of any piece of software is from open source, creating countless dependencies and areas of risk to manage. FOSSA is the most reliable automated policy engine for legal teams to maintain license compliance, security to fix vulnerabilities, and engineering to improve code quality across the entire software supply chain. As the only developer-native open source management platform, FOSSA fully integrates with your existing CI/CD pipeline to provide complete visibility and context earlier in the software development lifecycle. For the first time, teams can collaboratively shift left and audit, analyze, control, and remediate license issues and vulnerabilities right in their existing workflows.

Nexus Lifecycle gives you full control over your software supply chain and allows you to define rules, actions, and policies that work best for your organization and teams.

Offer
Learn more about Accurics
Learn more about FOSSA
Learn more about Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle
Sample Customers
Automation Anywhere, NBA, GroundTruth, ServiceMax, Navis, EdcastAppDyanmic, Uber, Twitter, Zendesk, ConfluentGenome.One, Blackboard, Crediterform, Crosskey, Intuit, Progress Software, Qualys, Liberty Mutual Insurance
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company43%
Legal Firm14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Manufacturing Company12%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm39%
Insurance Company17%
Computer Software Company11%
Transportation Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider12%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise57%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise54%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise59%
Find out what your peers are saying about FOSSA vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FOSSA is ranked 6th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 7 reviews while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is ranked 1st in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 21 reviews. FOSSA is rated 8.6, while Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of FOSSA writes "Compatibility with a wide range of dev tools, web and "C-type", enables us to scan across our ecosystem, including legacy software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle writes "Checks our libraries for security and licensing issues". FOSSA is most compared with Black Duck, WhiteSource, Snyk, JFrog Xray and Veracode Software Composition Analysis, whereas Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle is most compared with SonarQube, Black Duck, WhiteSource and Veracode. See our FOSSA vs. Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle report.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.