• Home
  • FrameMaker vs. OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL]

FrameMaker vs OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
The valuable features for us are format control and professional and clear output.
At the very beginning, we used to copy and edit source files for different versions of our software. Now we maintain only one source file for... Read more →
David Nixon
Integration with Adobe Suite was great, but there were too many limitations based on the composition tools used
xPression was touted as a future solution, but didn't meet needs and therefore was replaced. Limitations of functions compared to the tool it was... Read more →
Ranking
1st
out of 7 in Publishing Software
Views
257
Comparisons
170
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Publishing Software
Comparisons
Also Known As
EMC Document Sciences xPression
Learn More
Adobe
OpenText
Overview
Adobe FrameMaker is a complete solution for bidirectional technical content. Publish natively across channels, mobile devices and formats and author with best-in-class XML/DITA support. Collaborate seamlessly with experts, and manage content using integration with leading CMSs.
OpenText Document Sciences xPression Enterprise Edition helps utomates the generation of highly customized and personalized multichannel customer communications. With xPression, you can replace multiple document generation systems to reduce costs, streamline processes, and improve customer experience. It consolidate multiple single purpose and disparate systems onto a single flexible platform for all types of vital business communications. OpenText Document Sciences xPression Enterprise Edition automates the generation of millions of documents per hour, while supporting thousands of concurrent users, to increase operational efficiency, reduce costs, and ensure accuracy. It leverage familiar tools from Microsoft and Adobe to generate personalized and customized correspondence, contracts, statements, and marketing materials on-demand, interactively, and in high-volume batch and it uses industry standards such as Java, XML and Web Services to integrate with various operating systems, application servers, databases, and other existing enterprise systems.
Sample Customers
HaCon Ingenieurgesellschaft, ANA (All Nippon Airways Co. Ltd.), IBM, Marcia Riefer Johnston, Novell, AFNOR Publishing
Aksigorta, EmblemHealth, Independence Blue Cross, Sammons Financial Group, State Department of Labor, American Medical Security
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company20%
Manufacturing Company15%
Government10%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise65%
No Data Available

FrameMaker is ranked 1st in Publishing Software while OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Publishing Software. FrameMaker is rated 8.0, while OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of FrameMaker writes "The valuable features for us are format control and professional and clear output. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] writes "Integration with Adobe Suite was great, but there were too many limitations based on the composition tools used". FrameMaker is most compared with PTC Arbortext, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, QuarkXPress and Adobe Captivate, whereas OpenText Document Sciences xPression [EOL] is most compared with QuarkXPress.

See our list of best Publishing Software vendors.

We monitor all Publishing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.