Compare Frontline WAS vs. Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
Sponsored
 | Anonymous User R&D Director at a computer software company |
Use Frontline WAS? Share your opinion.
 | Fernando Carlos Project Manager at Everis |
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: April 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works."
"They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey."
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization."
"I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good."
"Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing."
"If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount."
"Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."
"We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."
Information Not Available
"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."
"The pricing can be improved because it is complex when compared to the competition."
"It is quite expensive. Pricing and the licensing model could be improved."
"It is cost-effective."
"Their subscriptions could use a little bit of a reworking, but I am very happy with what they're able to provide."
"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."
More Micro Focus Fortify on Demand Pricing and Cost Advice »
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Answer: My experience with Veracode across the board every time, in all products, the technology, the product, the service, and… more »
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The solution saves us a lot of money. We're trying to reduce exposure and costs related to remediation.
Top Answer: We pay for licensing. We do pay an extra cost for implementing the infrastructure into the cloud.
Top Answer: There's a bit of a learning curve. Our development team is struggling with following the rules and following the new… more »
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Frontline Web Application Scanning
Fortify on Demand
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.
Frontline WAS has been developed to provide the highest level of dynamic web application testing results through a system that is easily deployed and maintained. Enjoy the benefits of a technology you can trust to deliver unparalleled accuracy with minimal consumption of resources.
Micro Focus Fortify on Demand’s application security-as-a-service is the easy and flexible way to identify vulnerabilities in your applications without additional investment in software or personnel. Allow our global team to work for you, providing support and technical expertise 24/7.
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Frontline WAS
Learn more about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
State of Missouri, Rekner
Information Not Available
SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company10%
Computer Software Company10%
Healthcare Company8%
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
Financial Services Firm38%
Retailer19%
Computer Software Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government6%
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise48%
No Data Available
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise61%
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: April 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Frontline WAS is ranked 42nd in Application Security while Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is ranked 7th in Application Security with 14 reviews. Frontline WAS is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Fortify on Demand writes "Detects vulnerabilities and provides useful suggestions, but doesn't understand complex websites". Frontline WAS is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Coverity, Fortify WebInspect and HCL AppScan.
See our list of best Application Security vendors.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.