Compare Frontline WAS vs. Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
Frontline WAS is ranked 39th in Application Security while Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is ranked 6th in Application Security with 10 reviews. Frontline WAS is rated 0, while Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Fortify on Demand writes "Detects vulnerabilities and provides useful suggestions, but doesn't understand complex websites". Frontline WAS is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Fortify on Demand is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx and Veracode.
Sponsored | ||
 |
Most Helpful Review | ||||||
| Use Frontline WAS? Share your opinion. |
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2020. 406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey. They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works. Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription. No issues, the pricing seems reasonable. It is pricey. There is a lot of value in the product, but it is a costly tool. I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms. Costs are reasonable. No special infrastructure is required and the license model is good. I think the pricing is in line with the rest of the tools. I think you get what you pay for. It is certainly not inexpensive, but the value proposition is there. There are certainly cheaper tools, but I don't think we'd be getting the support that we get with those, and that is what separates this product from the others. | Information Not Available | The pricing can be improved because it is complex when compared to the competition. It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount. The licensing was good because the licenses have the heavy centralized server. The subscription model, on a per-scan basis, is a bit expensive. That's another reason we are not using it for all the apps. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs. 406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Top Comparisons | ||
 Compared 50% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. | Compared 37% of the time. Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time. | |
Also Known As | ||
| Frontline Web Application Scanning | Fortify on Demand | |
Learn | ||
| Veracode Video Not Available | Digital Defense | Micro Focus |
Overview  | ||
Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects. | Frontline WAS has been developed to provide the highest level of dynamic web application testing results through a system that is easily deployed and maintained. Enjoy the benefits of a technology you can trust to deliver unparalleled accuracy with minimal consumption of resources. | Micro Focus Fortify on Demand’s application security-as-a-service is the easy and flexible way to identify vulnerabilities in your applications without additional investment in software or personnel. Allow our global team to work for you, providing support and technical expertise 24/7. |
Offer | ||
Keep your software secure Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle. | Learn more about Frontline WAS | Learn more about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand |
Sample Customers | ||
| State of Missouri, Rekner | Information Not Available | SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more. |
Top Industries | ||
Financial Services Firm31% Insurance Company15% Consumer Goods8% Healthcare Company8% Software R&D Company40% Comms Service Provider12% Financial Services Firm6% Media Company6% | No Data Available | Financial Services Firm42% Retailer17% Government8% Energy/Utilities Company8% Software R&D Company43% Comms Service Provider11% Financial Services Firm7% Government7% |
Company Size | ||
Small Business21% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise55% Small Business16% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise74% | No Data Available | Small Business24% Midsize Enterprise10% Large Enterprise66% Small Business21% Midsize Enterprise4% Large Enterprise75% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, SonarQube, Sonatype and others in Application Security. Updated: March 2020.
406,312 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Frontline WAS Reviews, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand Reviews, and our list of Best Application Security Companies.
We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.