Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series vs NetApp V-Series [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series and NetApp V-Series [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
254
Comparisons
219
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Eternus DX400 series
Learn More
NetApp
Video Not Available
Overview

The Fujitsu Storage ETERNUS DX series aligns storage resources with business priorities, thus enabling higher system utilization and delivering increased system consolidation capabilities and a faster ROI. ETERNUS SF provides enterprise-class functionalities in the entry and midrange class and allows flexible disaster recovery and business continuity concepts for the different model sizes, thus decreasing investment costs.

NetApp V-Series storage virtualization controllers provide leading data protection, data management, and storage efficiency for your existing EMC, HDS, HP, IBM, Fujitsu, and NetApp E-Series storage arrays. Reclaim 35% or more capacity and reduce what you must spend for new disk drives to handle data growth by using NetApp storage efficiency features such as deduplication, thin provisioning, and compression. Optimize your workload performance with our broad flash portfolio.
Sample Customers
DDOR Novi Sad
City of Houston, Health Choice Network, SVC Bank, Plex Systems, Larsen & Toubro, IWD, JCVI
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is ranked 11th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while NetApp V-Series [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is rated 0.0, while NetApp V-Series [EOL] is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp V-Series [EOL] writes "Connects third-party storage to back end with all NetApp functionalities available". Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA and NetApp FAS Series, whereas NetApp V-Series [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.