Global-active device vs InfoSphere Data Replication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Global-active device and InfoSphere Data Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Replication Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
out of 31 in Data Replication
Views
115
Comparisons
90
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
25th
out of 31 in Data Replication
Views
44
Comparisons
16
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Data Replication
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.

IBMers believe in progress—that the application of intelligence, reason and science can improve business, society and the human condition.Powered by the latest innovations in machine learning, Watson lets you learn more with less data. No matter how you use Watson, your data and insights belong to you − and only you.

Sample Customers
BMW Group, Datev, Turk Telecom, Tel Aviv Stock Exchange
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Data Replication
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Fivetran, Dell Technologies and others in Data Replication. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Global-active device is ranked 18th in Data Replication while InfoSphere Data Replication is ranked 25th in Data Replication. Global-active device is rated 0.0, while InfoSphere Data Replication is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global-active device is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas InfoSphere Data Replication is most compared with .

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.