Global Crossing Network Services vs Verizon Network Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
21st
Views
22
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
320
Comparisons
186
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

CenturyLink® Managed Network Services can take the burden off your team so they can focus on growing your business.

Verizon Managed Network Services can Save you the time and expense of training staff, Help you control OPEX and CAPEX, Provide insight into customer behavior to refine products, ramp up demand and deliver better experiences, Tune up your network with better visibility into performance and Deliver on strong service level agreements (SLAs). It Offers the following services: Managed WAN, Managed SD WAN, Managed WAN Optimization services, Managed LAN, Managed Wireless LAN, Virtual Network Services and Software Defined Perimeter.
Sample Customers
TVRL GmbH & Co
International Power Company
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization54%
Financial Services Firm9%
Retailer6%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise55%
Large Enterprise29%

Global Crossing Network Services is ranked 21st in Service Provider Networks while Verizon Network Services is ranked 4th in Service Provider Networks. Global Crossing Network Services is rated 0.0, while Verizon Network Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global Crossing Network Services is most compared with , whereas Verizon Network Services is most compared with BT Network Services and GTT Communications Network Services.

See our list of best Service Provider Networks vendors.

We monitor all Service Provider Networks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.