We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare GNU Make vs. Harness

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Make Logo
413 views|360 comparisons
Harness Logo
2,865 views|2,693 comparisons
Ranking
16th
out of 32 in Build Automation
Views
413
Comparisons
360
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 32 in Build Automation
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,693
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Harness
Video Not Available
Overview
Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.

Offer
Learn more about GNU Make
Learn more about Harness
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer9%
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: October 2021.
542,823 professionals have used our research since 2012.

GNU Make is ranked 16th in Build Automation while Harness is ranked 11th in Build Automation. GNU Make is rated 0.0, while Harness is rated 0.0. On the other hand, GNU Make is most compared with Jenkins, whereas Harness is most compared with Jenkins, CircleCI, Bamboo, TeamCity and GitLab.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.