GNU Make vs Oracle Hudson CI comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Logo
230 views|189 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
105 views|82 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GNU Make and Oracle Hudson CI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."
  • "GNU Make is free and open source software."
  • More GNU Make Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    25th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    230
    Comparisons
    189
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    32nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    105
    Comparisons
    82
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Hudson CI
    Learn More
    Overview
    Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

    Hudson monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Among those things, currently Hudson focuses on the following two jobs:

    • Building/testing software projects continuously, just like CruiseControl or DamageControl. In a nutshell, Hudson provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases productivity.
    • Monitoring executions of externally-run jobs, such as cron jobs and procmail jobs, even those that are run on a remote machine. For example, with cron, all you receive is regular e-mails that capture the output, and it is up to you to look at them diligently and notice when it broke. Hudson keeps those outputs and makes it easy for you to notice when something is wrong.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Virgin Media
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GNU Make is ranked 25th in Build Automation while Oracle Hudson CI is ranked 32nd in Build Automation. GNU Make is rated 8.2, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GNU Make writes "Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as needed". On the other hand, GNU Make is most compared with Jenkins and Bazel, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with Jenkins.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.