GNU Make vs JFrog Pipeline comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Logo
226 views|183 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
JFrog Logo
303 views|280 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GNU Make and JFrog Pipeline based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I have not encountered any scalability issues with GNU Make. It is as scalable as the project's structure is, and then some.""Setup is extremely straightforward.""GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to resort to doing everything manually or via shell scripts.""Makefiles are extremely easy to work with using any preferred editor. GNU Make can be run directly from the terminal, not requiring any time wasted on clicking.""Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as one wishes, and declarative approach fits the task really well. Wide adoption also means that everybody knows what GNU Make is and how to use it."

More GNU Make Pros →

"Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point with the additional pipelines making it more interesting to see what is happening across your development process in a single pane of glass.""The platform has some amazing features and the integration option makes it very simple to plug with any of our favorite tools."

More JFrog Pipeline Pros →

Cons
"GNU Make requires using the Tab symbol as the first symbol of command line for execution. In some text editors this can be problematic, as they automatically insert spaces instead of tabs.""Vanilla GNU Make does not support any kind of colored output. A wrapper named colormake exists to work around this, but native (opt-in) support would be welcome."

More GNU Make Cons →

"They could work on reducing the number of permissions required while using Bitbucket."

More JFrog Pipeline Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."
  • "GNU Make is free and open source software."
  • More GNU Make Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is the cheapest compared to the other platforms out there."
  • More JFrog Pipeline Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    26th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    226
    Comparisons
    183
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    22nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    303
    Comparisons
    280
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 68% of the time.
    Bazel logo
    Compared 32% of the time.
    Jenkins logo
    Compared 52% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Shippable
    Learn More
    Overview
    Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.
    JFrog Pipelines empowers software teams to ship updates faster by automating DevOps processes in a continuously streamlined and secure way across all their teams and tools. Encompassing continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery (CD), infrastructure and more, it automates everything from code to production. Pipelines is natively integrated with the JFrog Platform and is available with both cloud (software-as-a-service) and on-prem subscriptions.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    SAP, Today Tix, Cisco, Lithium, Pushspring, Packet
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GNU Make is ranked 26th in Build Automation while JFrog Pipeline is ranked 22nd in Build Automation. GNU Make is rated 8.2, while JFrog Pipeline is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GNU Make writes "Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Pipeline writes "Testing against multiple run times, versions, and environments is a plus point". GNU Make is most compared with Jenkins and Bazel, whereas JFrog Pipeline is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo, Harness, TeamCity and GitHub Actions.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.