Compare Google Cloud Memorystore vs. NetApp Global File Cache Core
Ranking  | |
Views 143 Comparisons 120 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 0 Comparisons 0 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 48% of the time.  Compared 31% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Memorystore | |
Learn | |
| Google | NetApp Video Not Available |
Overview | |
Memorystore for Redis provides a fully managed in-memory data store service built on scalable, secure, and highly available infrastructure managed by Google. Use Memorystore to build application caches that provides sub-millisecond data access. | NetApp's intelligent Global File Cache creates a software fabric that caches “active data” sets in distributed offices globally. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Google Cloud Memorystore | Learn more about NetApp Global File Cache Core |
Sample Customers | |
| Paypal, Target, The Home Depot | FACTO GEO, RobertBird Group, METROMONT |
Google Cloud Memorystore is ranked 1st in In-Memory Data Store Services while NetApp Global File Cache Core is ranked 9th in In-Memory Data Store Services. Google Cloud Memorystore is rated 0.0, while NetApp Global File Cache Core is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Google Cloud Memorystore is most compared with Amazon ElastiCache, Azure Cache for Redis, IBM Cloud Databases for Redis and RedisLabs, whereas NetApp Global File Cache Core is most compared with .
See our list of best In-Memory Data Store Services vendors.
We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.