Compare Google Cloud Memorystore vs. RedisLabs

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Google Cloud Memorystore Logo
52 views|36 comparisons
RedisLabs Logo
14 views|10 comparisons
Ranking
Views
52
Comparisons
36
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
14
Comparisons
10
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
MemorystoreRedis Enterprise
Learn
Google
RedisLabs
Overview

Memorystore for Redis provides a fully managed in-memory data store service built on scalable, secure, and highly available infrastructure managed by Google. Use Memorystore to build application caches that provides sub-millisecond data access.

Redis Labs is the home of Redis, the world’s most popular in-memory database, and commercial provider of Redis Enterprise, which delivers superior performance, unmatched reliability, and the best TCO. Initially employed as a caching layer, Redis is now used by virtually every large enterprise, startup, and government organization to power use cases such as e-commerce, AI/ML, search, fraud detection, real-time inventory management, user session stores, and much more.

Offer
Learn more about Google Cloud Memorystore
Learn more about RedisLabs
Sample Customers
Paypal, Target, The Home DepotPhP, Python, hiredis, Java, Go
Google Cloud Memorystore is ranked 1st in In-Memory Data Store Services while RedisLabs is ranked 5th in In-Memory Data Store Services. Google Cloud Memorystore is rated 0.0, while RedisLabs is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Google Cloud Memorystore is most compared with Azure Cache for Redis, Amazon ElastiCache and IBM Cloud Databases for Redis, whereas RedisLabs is most compared with .

See our list of best In-Memory Data Store Services vendors.

We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.