Gurucul UEBA vs Microsoft ATA [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Gurucul Logo
1,267 views|249 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
views| comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gurucul UEBA and Microsoft ATA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS.""The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment.""The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."

More Gurucul UEBA Pros →

"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity.""The stability of the solution is very good.""The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"It could be more stable.""Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves.""Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."

More Gurucul UEBA Cons →

"It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict.""Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate.""There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is fair. In fact, I believe it was on the cheaper side when compared to the competition."
  • "The price of Gurucul is competitive."
  • More Gurucul UEBA Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."
  • More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS.
    Top Answer:The price of Gurucul is competitive. I rate the price of Gurucul a three out of five.
    Top Answer:Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system. This is one area where Gurucul UEBA could improve. Additionally, it… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,267
    Comparisons
    249
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    782
    Rating
    6.5
    Unranked
    In User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics, MS ATA [EOL]
    Learn More
    Gurucul
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Threats are a moving target. Determined and persistent threat actors purposely stretch out their activity across weeks or even months, especially when most SIEM and XDR solutions are incapable of piecing together events across time. Even worse, is that these solutions primarily use rule-based Machine Learning, which is essentially pattern matching. This makes them especially ineffective in detecting new attacks and/or variants, which are highly successful in breaching organizations. Discover how Gurucul UEBA security can help your enterprise.

    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
    Sample Customers
    Global semi-conductor company
    Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Real Estate/Law Firm6%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise59%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Gurucul UEBA is ranked 11th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Gurucul UEBA is rated 6.6, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Gurucul UEBA writes "Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". Gurucul UEBA is most compared with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Wazuh, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.