Compare HashiCorp Consul vs. Kong Kuma

HashiCorp Consul is ranked 1st in Service Mesh while Kong Kuma is ranked 3rd in Service Mesh. HashiCorp Consul is rated 0, while Kong Kuma is rated 0. On the other hand, HashiCorp Consul is most compared with AWS App Mesh and Kong Kuma, whereas Kong Kuma is most compared with HashiCorp Consul and AWS App Mesh.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HashiCorp Consul Logo
43 views|39 comparisons
Kong Kuma Logo
35 views|27 comparisons
Ranking
1st
out of 7 in Service Mesh
Views
43
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 7 in Service Mesh
Views
35
Comparisons
27
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 67% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 61% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Also Known As
Kuma
Learn
HashiCorp
Kong
Video Not Available
Overview

Multiple clouds and private datacenters with dynamic IPs, ephemeral containers, dominated by east-west traffic, no clear network perimeters.

CONSUL APPROACH
-Centralized registry to locate any service
-Services discovered and connected with centralized policies
-Network automated in service of applications
-Zero trust network enforced by identity-based security policies

CRD + RESTful Interface
Built on top of Envoy, Kuma can be fully operated via simple CRDs on Kubernetes or with a RESTful API on other platforms. GUI included.

L4 + L7 Policies
Connect your Microservices with Kuma, and apply intuitive policies for security, observability, routing, and more in one command.

Platform Agnostic
Kuma can run anywhere, on Kubernetes and VMs, in the cloud or on-premise, in single or multi-datacenter setups.

Offer
Learn more about HashiCorp Consul
Learn more about Kong Kuma
We monitor all Service Mesh reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.