We performed a comparison between CucumberStudio and OpenText ALM / Quality Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The best thing is that a person without knowledge about the program can easily understand what happened in our testing process."
"The data table that helps in converting a single script to multiple test cases is very helpful."
"Easily integrates with Oracle e-Business Suite."
"It provides visibility on release status and readiness."
"ALM Quality Center is a reliable, consolidated product."
"Business process management is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The most valuable user feature that we use right now is the camera."
"It allows us to easily make linkage and dependencies, with plenty of integrations."
"It has a good response time."
"I like the traceability, especially between requirements, testing, and defects."
"I think it would be better if we could also do the reporting with CucumberStudio."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"Micro Focus ALM Quality Center could improve its marketing. For example, Tricentis is much better at letting the market know about new solutions and updates. The migration of the tool could improve, but it can be difficult."
"I'd like to see the concept of teams put into it."
"It is pricey."
"The product is good, it's great, but when compared to other products with the latest methodologies, or when rating it as a software development tool, then I'll have to rate it with a lower score because there's a lot of other great tools where you can interconnect them, use them, scale them, and leverage. It all depends on the cost."
"The uploading of test scripts can get a little cumbersome and that is a very sensitive task. They could improve on that a lot. It's really important that this gets better as I'm loading close to a thousand test scripts per cycle."
"The BPT also known as Business Process Testing can sometimes be very time intensive and sometimes might not be very intuitive to someone who is not familiar with BPT."
"We are looking for more automation capabilities."
"ALM Quality Center could be improved with more techniques to manage Agile processes."
More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
CucumberStudio is ranked 28th in Rapid Application Development Software with 8 reviews while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 197 reviews. CucumberStudio is rated 8.2, while OpenText ALM / Quality Center is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CucumberStudio writes "An easy -to -use scalable cloud-based solution which needs some improvement with programming automation and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ALM / Quality Center writes "Offers features for higher-end traceability and integration with different tools but lacks in scalability ". CucumberStudio is most compared with GitHub CoPilot, whereas OpenText ALM / Quality Center is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, OpenText ALM Octane, Jira, Tricentis qTest and Zephyr Enterprise.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.