Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs Intel MFSYS25 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi Vantara Logo
views| comparisons
Intel Logo
51 views|30 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] and Intel MFSYS25 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
21st
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
51
Comparisons
30
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BladeSymphony
MFSYS25
Learn More
Overview

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

This Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25/MFSYS35 platform supports up to six compute modules, up to fourteen hot-swap 2.5-inch SAS hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS25, or up to six hot-swap 3.5-inch SAS/SATA hard disk drives in the Intel Modular Server System MFSYS35, an integrated server management module, redundant Ethernet switches, and redundant storage controllers. The server ships configured for rack mounting, but may be mounted in a pedestal configuration. 

Sample Customers
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
Eisenhower & Carlson, PLLC
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while Intel MFSYS25 is ranked 21st in Blade Servers. Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Intel MFSYS25 is rated 6.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Intel MFSYS25 writes " We're able to set-up multiple VLANs in it". Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Intel MFSYS25 is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.