Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] vs NEC Sigmablade-M comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] and NEC Sigmablade-M based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Blade Servers
20th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
44
Comparisons
37
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BladeSymphony
Sigmablade-M
Learn More
Overview

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.

Sample Customers
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
Sysmex Shanghai
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers while NEC Sigmablade-M is ranked 20th in Blade Servers. Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0, while NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with , whereas NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.