Hitachi Mercury [EOL] vs SGI InfiniteStorage NAS 50 [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hitachi Mercury [EOL] and SGI InfiniteStorage NAS 50 [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS.
To learn more, read our detailed NAS Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In NAS
Unranked
In NAS
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Mercury, BlueArc
InfiniteStorage NAS 50
Learn More
Overview
Mercury Technology has established comprehensive Managed Service plans for the Oracle software suite.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
Moravian Land Archive, Nacamar, Neopost (France), Nielsen//NetRatings, Pacific Capital Bancorp, Raiffeisen Bank, Sema, Victoria and Albert Museum, Wasu Digital TV Media Group
Osaka University
Buyer's Guide
NAS
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Nasuni and others in NAS. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS while SGI InfiniteStorage NAS 50 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in NAS. Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SGI InfiniteStorage NAS 50 [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi Mercury [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SGI InfiniteStorage NAS 50 [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.