Compare Hitachi NAS vs. Qumulo

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hitachi NAS Logo
1,369 views|1,069 comparisons
Qumulo Logo
5,752 views|4,838 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The pricing of this solution is good, which is an advantage that positions this product well.""The most valuable feature is its ability to handle a high number of users while maintaining both stability and performance.""Simple and extremely reliable."

More Hitachi NAS Pros »

"The feature that I like most is the analytics part of the file system.""The most valuable feature is real-time analytics."

More Qumulo Pros »

Cons
"I do not like Hitachi NAS because it's an old-school NAS solution, compared to the other, newer-type solutions such as Isilon from Dell or Qumulo.""I would like to see the inclusion of support for cloud-connectivity to providers like AWS.""The monitoring tool is not well developed."

More Hitachi NAS Cons »

"In the future, I would like to see non-disruptive updates.""The price of the software is a bit expensive, so a reduction in cost would make it more competitive."

More Qumulo Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

More Hitachi NAS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is its ability to handle a high number of users while maintaining both stability and performance.
Top Answer: This solution is not suitable for SMB because the price is more expensive. Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount. It really depends on the needs of the client.
Top Answer: We would like to have a more economical version of this solution that is suitable for use with a mid-range scale, such as one that can handle between 35,000 and 50,000 users. The manageability needs… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
9th
out of 26 in NAS
Views
1,369
Comparisons
1,069
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
381
Rating
7.5
10th
out of 26 in NAS
Views
5,752
Comparisons
4,838
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
367
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Learn
Hitachi
Qumulo
Overview
Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

Qumulo is the breakthrough leader in simplifying unstructured data management at massive scale across hybrid-cloud environments. Qumulo provides a high-performance file data platform designed to store, manage and create workflows and applications with data in its native file form at a massive scale across hybrid cloud environments. With Qumulo you can easily manage the full data lifecycle from ingestion, transformation, publishing and archiving with cost-effective capacity, dynamic scalability, automatic encryption, real-time analytics and an advanced API that enables customers to easily integrate Qumulo into their technology ecosystem and workflows.

Offer
Learn more about Hitachi NAS
Learn more about Qumulo
Sample Customers
Intersect AustraliaCounty of Riverside Sheriff Department, Hyundai Mobis Automotive North America, University of Arizona, UCSD - San Diego Supercomputer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Sinclair Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Kaiser Permanente, Deluxe Creative, Vexcel Imaging, University of Florida, The Madison Square Garden Company, Arizona State University, Cinesite, San Diego Padres Baseball, Johns Hopkins University - School of Medicine, IHME, EllieMae, Washington State University.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider22%
Manufacturing Company12%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer6%
Manufacturing Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS vs. Qumulo and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Hitachi NAS is ranked 9th in NAS with 3 reviews while Qumulo is ranked 10th in NAS with 2 reviews. Hitachi NAS is rated 7.6, while Qumulo is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi NAS writes "Good performance and reliability, but the management interface needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qumulo writes "Easy to set up, good technical support, and it provides valuable usage analytics ". Hitachi NAS is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, IBM FlashSystem, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform N Series and HPE 3PAR StoreServ, whereas Qumulo is most compared with Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp FAS Series, Scality RING8, Buurst SoftNAS and Red Hat Ceph Storage. See our Hitachi NAS vs. Qumulo report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.