Compare Hitachi ShadowImage vs. IBM Softek TDMF
Views
73
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
253
Comparisons
173
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 100% of the time.
Softek TDMF
Nondisruptive, high-speed data replication within any Hitachi storage system or virtualized storage pool is a reality with Hitachi ShadowImage replication software. Use data immediately in modern data protection and copy data management operations.
IBM Data Mobility Services Ð Softek Transparent Data Migration Facility (TDMF) z/OS uses skilled experts for a more reliable data migration, helping reduce the risk of disruptions or outages and enabling continuous application availability.
Learn more about Hitachi ShadowImage
Learn more about IBM Softek TDMF
K&H, NCF, Aokang Group
BT
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hitachi ShadowImage is ranked 15th in Data Replication while IBM Softek TDMF is ranked 10th in Data Replication. Hitachi ShadowImage is rated 0.0, while IBM Softek TDMF is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi ShadowImage is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas IBM Softek TDMF is most compared with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.