Compare Hitachi TrueCopy vs. IBM Softek TDMF
Views
117
Comparisons
100
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
250
Comparisons
169
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,891 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 70% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Softek TDMF
For everyday uptime and rapid recovery demands in the event of an outage, choose Hitachi TrueCopy remote replication software. TrueCopy synchronously mirrors data between Hitachi storage systems across metropolitan distances.
IBM Data Mobility Services Ð Softek Transparent Data Migration Facility (TDMF) z/OS uses skilled experts for a more reliable data migration, helping reduce the risk of disruptions or outages and enabling continuous application availability.
Learn more about Hitachi TrueCopy
Learn more about IBM Softek TDMF
Information Not Available
BT
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, HVR Software, Dell EMC and others in Data Replication. Updated: February 2021.
465,891 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Hitachi TrueCopy is ranked 12th in Data Replication while IBM Softek TDMF is ranked 11th in Data Replication. Hitachi TrueCopy is rated 0.0, while IBM Softek TDMF is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Hitachi TrueCopy is most compared with Hitachi ShadowImage and Hitachi Universal Replicator, whereas IBM Softek TDMF is most compared with Dell EMC RecoverPoint Continuous Remote Replication.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.