Fivetran vs Qlik Compose comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fivetran Logo
4,412 views|2,978 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Qlik Logo
2,092 views|1,579 comparisons
81% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fivetran and Qlik Compose based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,.""The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it.""The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything.""The portal is very intuitive and easy to use.""You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when.""The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering.""The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available.""The most important feature of the solution is its ability to build data pipelines in less time."

More Fivetran Pros →

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms.""I like modeling and code generation. It has become a pretty handy tool because of its short ideation to delivery time. From the time you decide you are modeling a data warehouse, and once you finish the modeling, it generates all the code, generates all the tables. All you have to do is tick a few things, and you can produce a fully functional warehouse. I also like that they have added all the features I have asked for over four years.""The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten.""The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.""Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive.""As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good.""It can scale.""It's a stable solution."

More Qlik Compose Pros →

Cons
"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks.""The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results.""The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure.""The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums.""We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool.""Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors.""The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly.""The environment must be more development-friendly."

More Fivetran Cons →

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved.""There should be proper documentation available for the implementation process.""There is some scope for improvement around the documentation, and a better UI would definitely help.""My issues with the solution's stability are owing to the fact that it has certain bugs causing issues in some functionalities that should be working.""It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it.""There could be more customization options.""I'd like to have access to more developer training materials.""When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

More Qlik Compose Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."
  • "I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."
  • "Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."
  • "I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."
  • "In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."
  • "I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."
  • "The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."
  • "The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."
  • More Fivetran Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."
  • "The price of the solution is expensive."
  • "While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."
  • More Qlik Compose Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become some… more »
    Top Answer: I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can… more »
    Top Answer:As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Software… more »
    Top Answer:There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cubes… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.
    Top Answer:While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    4,412
    Comparisons
    2,978
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    603
    Rating
    8.0
    20th
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    2,092
    Comparisons
    1,579
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    460
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Compose, Attunity Compose
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fivetran is a data integration and migration solution that centralizes data from various sources into a data warehouse (such as Snowflake or BigQuery) for analytics. Its most valuable features include replication and managed pipelines, integration with DBT for data transformation, and many source connections. 

    Fivetran is easy to use, with fast data migration and an intuitive portal for easy setup and troubleshooting. It has helped organizations integrate and manage data, saving time and resources.

    Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility. 

    Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

    Sample Customers
    DocuSign, Oldcastle Infrastructure, Crossmedia, Talkdesk, Chubbies, Brandwatch
    Poly-Wood
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company42%
    Outsourcing Company17%
    Transportation Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fivetran is ranked 13th in Data Integration with 19 reviews while Qlik Compose is ranked 20th in Data Integration with 12 reviews. Fivetran is rated 8.0, while Qlik Compose is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fivetran writes "Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qlik Compose writes "Easy matching and reconciliation of data". Fivetran is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Azure Data Factory, Oracle GoldenGate and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas Qlik Compose is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Talend Open Studio, Azure Data Factory, SSIS and Palantir Foundry. See our Fivetran vs. Qlik Compose report.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.