Hyland Enterprise Search vs Lucidworks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
102 views|59 comparisons
Lucidworks Logo
358 views|188 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland Enterprise Search and Lucidworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, IBM, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search.
To learn more, read our detailed Indexing and Search Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price of the solution is a little high and the downside is there is not a perpetual license available. I have to renew it annually. The price of Lucidworks can be difficult for some of my clients to afford."
  • More Lucidworks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    13th
    out of 25 in Indexing and Search
    Views
    102
    Comparisons
    59
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    out of 25 in Indexing and Search
    Views
    358
    Comparisons
    188
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Indexing and Search
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, IBM, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ISYS, Perceptive Enterprise Search
    Learn More
    Hyland
    Video Not Available
    Lucidworks
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Enterprise Search from Hyland enables you to find the precise information you need from inside any type of document, file and email generated across your organization and located in content repositories, SharePoint sites, email systems, network shares, intranets, extranets, websites, databases, social media and all other places.  Being able to quickly locate information across all these places can help your users complete a task, solve a problem or advance a business process more efficiently and can help your organization reduce information security risk and improve compliance.

    Lucidworks builds AI-powered search and discovery applications for some of the world's largest brands. Fusion, Lucidworks' advanced development platform, provides the enterprise-grade capabilities needed to design, develop and deploy intelligent search apps at any scale.

    Sample Customers
    Wells Fargo, Cisco, Nike, Target, Verizon, Hortonworks
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Indexing and Search
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, IBM, OpenText and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hyland Enterprise Search is ranked 13th in Indexing and Search while Lucidworks is ranked 7th in Indexing and Search. Hyland Enterprise Search is rated 0.0, while Lucidworks is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lucidworks writes "Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform". Hyland Enterprise Search is most compared with , whereas Lucidworks is most compared with Elastic Search and Coveo.

    See our list of best Indexing and Search vendors.

    We monitor all Indexing and Search reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.