• Home
  • IBM Cloud Databases for Redis vs. Varnish Enterprise

IBM Cloud Databases for Redis vs Varnish Enterprise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
8th
out of 11 in In-Memory Data Store Services
Views
152
Comparisons
63
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
out of 11 in In-Memory Data Store Services
Views
51
Comparisons
37
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
IBM
Varnish Software
Overview

Databases for Redis gives two Redis instances—a master and a replica member—with Redis sentinels monitoring both. Accessing the database is managed through a single Kubernetes Nodeport, behind which one or more HAProxy instances handle all the traffic. It’s the HAProxy instances that manage to which we’ve added support for TLS/SSL encryption for incoming connections to the Redis server—something Redis doesn’t do out-of-the-box currently.

The leading content delivery technology stack for incredible
streaming experiences, optimized CDNs and responsive
websites, with unmatched performance and resilience
for staying online at scale and satisfying every user.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
University of Helsinki, Servcorp, Zype, Com Hem, University of Wuppertal

IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is ranked 8th in In-Memory Data Store Services while Varnish Enterprise is ranked 9th in In-Memory Data Store Services. IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is rated 0.0, while Varnish Enterprise is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is most compared with , whereas Varnish Enterprise is most compared with Amazon ElastiCache.

See our list of best In-Memory Data Store Services vendors.

We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.