Compare IBM Cloud Databases for Redis vs. Varnish Enterprise

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
40
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
3
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Learn
IBM
Varnish Software
Overview

Databases for Redis gives two Redis instances—a master and a replica member—with Redis sentinels monitoring both. Accessing the database is managed through a single Kubernetes Nodeport, behind which one or more HAProxy instances handle all the traffic. It’s the HAProxy instances that manage to which we’ve added support for TLS/SSL encryption for incoming connections to the Redis server—something Redis doesn’t do out-of-the-box currently.

The leading content delivery technology stack for incredible
streaming experiences, optimized CDNs and responsive
websites, with unmatched performance and resilience
for staying online at scale and satisfying every user.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Cloud Databases for Redis
Learn more about Varnish Enterprise
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
University of Helsinki, Servcorp, Zype, Com Hem, University of Wuppertal

IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is ranked 4th in In-Memory Data Store Services while Varnish Enterprise is ranked 8th in In-Memory Data Store Services. IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is rated 0.0, while Varnish Enterprise is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Cloud Databases for Redis is most compared with Google Cloud Memorystore, whereas Varnish Enterprise is most compared with .

See our list of best In-Memory Data Store Services vendors.

We monitor all In-Memory Data Store Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.