We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Security and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Akamai and others in Cloud and Data Center Security."The interface is good and very user-friendly."
"QRadar UBA's most valuable feature is the risk rating of users depending on their behavior."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its artificial intelligence component, Watson. Its contribution is pretty good from a machine-learning artificial intelligence perspective. This compliments the orchestration automation component, as well."
"There are a lot of features in QRadar. App Exchange is the most valuable feature. User behavior analytics (UBA) is also a very good feature. Watson is also there, but we are not currently using Watson. It is versatile and quite easy. It also has an all-in-one-box feature and good integration with AWS."
"Overall a great solution."
"It's quite scalable. We have upgraded some solutions from 1000 APS up to 3500 APS to 5000 APS. It's a good solution, they have no scalability issues."
"The ability to transition from microscopic to macroscopic view, instantly, is very good."
"The stability is good."
"The product has plenty of features and capabilities."
"Lacks sufficient technical support."
"The product needs to improve its GUI."
"They should introduce some automation into the product."
"The threat detection needs improvement, they have many false positives."
"There should be easier and wider integration opportunities. There should be more opportunities for integration with CTI info sharing areas. On platforms where you exchange CTI, there should be more visibility connected to what we share, what we can reach, or what options are connected to CTI info sharing. This is one area where they could add value because we cannot integrate it easily with QRadar. If a client has a legacy or already existing solutions for CTI, we cannot ask them to forget it because we cannot guarantee that QRadar is able to deliver everything connected to this area."
"There could be better integration with the solution."
"There is a shortage of skilled individuals with knowledge about the solution. There is training required."
"We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow."
"The user interface needs improvement."
IBM Cloud Pak for Security is ranked 21st in Cloud and Data Center Security with 1 review while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 4th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 198 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is rated 0.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Security writes "Great user-friendly interface; provides many functionalities and many free applications ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". IBM Cloud Pak for Security is most compared with IBM Resilient, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.