• Home
  • IBM Controller vs. SAS Activity-Based Management

IBM Controller vs SAS Activity-Based Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Business Performance Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM Controller and SAS Activity-Based Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Performance Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use IBM Controller?
Anonymous User
OLAP data extraction and export is a valuable feature but the drilling function needs to be brought back.
ABM: * We use ABM as an expense allocation model and it has improve the awareness and accountability of the cost incurred (due to the... Read more →
Ranking
27th
out of 42 in Business Performance Management
Views
96
Comparisons
91
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
out of 42 in Business Performance Management
Views
283
Comparisons
199
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business Performance Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
IBM
SAS
Overview
IBM Cognos Controller supports the close, consolidation and reporting process with the agility and affordability of a cloud-based solution. It enables finance teams to automate and accelerate the financial close with minimal IT support. It also helps finance teams deliver financial results, create informative financial and management reports and provide the chief financial officer (CFO) with an enterprise view of key financial ratios and metrics.
SAS Activity-Based Management is an analytic application that models business processes to determine cost, profitability and drivers. With this solution, organizations can make informed decisions that streamline processes, deliver revenue growth and reduce costs across the organization.
Sample Customers
California Franchise Tax Board, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Mirle Automation Corp., Radware
Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Computer Software Company17%
Government9%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise63%
Buyer's Guide
Business Performance Management
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Controller is ranked 27th in Business Performance Management while SAS Activity-Based Management is ranked 19th in Business Performance Management. IBM Controller is rated 0.0, while SAS Activity-Based Management is rated 5.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Activity-Based Management writes "OLAP data extraction and export is a valuable feature but the drilling function needs to be brought back". IBM Controller is most compared with IBM Cognos and Oracle HFM, whereas SAS Activity-Based Management is most compared with Oracle Hyperion.

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.