Compare IBM Guardium Data Protection vs. McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Guardium Data Protection vs. McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It allows us to put in controls to make sure that only the right persons access the proper records in the database.""From the perspective of analysis and prevention, this product is pretty accurate.""Ease of deployment is a valuable feature.""The most valuable features are the reporting and data-level access control.""he solution offers trouble-free access.""One of the most valuable features is the accelerator. It has a predefined report for PCI SOX compliance and other compliances.""IBM Guardium Data Protection has better integration options than most of the leading competitors on the market, and the price is always better.""The product has proven to be flexible"

More IBM Guardium Data Protection Pros »

"The support is very good. They are very quick to respond when we have issues.""The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable."

More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases Pros »

Cons
"The biggest complaint that I hear from customers and users is that using this solution requires database skills, yet it is a security and monitoring tool.""Sometimes the connectors to the databases need to be manually updated and we have to configure them again, which is something that should be improved.""Flexibility could be improved.""The price of this solution is quite high for smaller organizations, so they should release a version that is affordable for small and medium-sized businesses.""The technical support is very poor.""The most important requirements for us are integration with new database solutions and the ability to manage things like Jailbreak or something like that. Its reduction feature can also be improved. It has a functionality called reduction, which is like masking data, but it is just a replacement of characters. Sometimes the customer needs more than this. It would be good if it was more advanced or complete. We also have a problem with this solution because the IBM aggregator isn't working very well. IBM has created big data intelligence for Guardium, and occasionally, customers need three or four months of data, but they can't run it from the collectors. It can have a better dashboard and more pre-defined use cases for those customers who don't have any idea about data protection or don't have expert personnel in this area. For example, they can include five use cases for banks and five use cases for retail.""Guardium Data Protection is far better in terms of external integration. But in terms of firewall features, like when you're blocking activities, it's as if Oracle AVDF simply has superior features. This is just from third-party observations, but the users of Oracle AVDF are saying that when it comes to the firewall and protection functionality, they're much more inclined to AVDF.""The installation should be a bit easier."

More IBM Guardium Data Protection Cons »

"The UI needs to be improved.""Technical support could be more responsive."

More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"One of the deployments that I know of had three databases, and the yearly fees are approximately $50,000 USD.""Its cost is good. With the new metric of licensing, such as PDO not being available now, customers are expecting a good price for the solution.""For IBM Guardium, licensing is very simple and straightforward. There are no issues I can speak of."

More IBM Guardium Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It's not expensive compared to other products that are available."

More McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Security solutions are best for your needs.
479,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: IBM Guardium Data Protection has better integration options than most of the leading competitors on the market, and the price is always better.
Top Answer: For IBM Guardium, licensing is very simple and straightforward. There are no issues I can speak of. Regarding the pricing, Guardium's price is always better compared to competitors like Oracle. It's… more »
Top Answer: One thing I'm always thinking with regard to Guardium Data Protection is that, when compared to Oracle AVDF, Oracle's often got the upper hand when it comes to the standard features. So I believe that… more »
Top Answer: The technical support is good; they are knowledgeable.
Top Answer: It's not expensive compared to other products that are available.
Ranking
2nd
out of 19 in Database Security
Views
13,430
Comparisons
6,246
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
774
Rating
8.3
5th
out of 19 in Database Security
Views
115
Comparisons
34
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
380
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
InfoSphere Guardium, Guardium, IBM Guardium
Learn More
Overview

The IBM Security Guardium portfolio empowers organizations to grow their business and prove compliance with smarter data protection capabilities. It provides complete visibility, actionable insights, real time controls and automated compliance workflows throughout the entire data protection journey, to support your most critical data protection needs.

IBM Security Guardium delivers discovery & classification, vulnerability & risk assessments, real-time monitoring & alerting, encryption, advanced analytics and compliance reporting across structured, unstructured, and semi-structured data in on-prem (including mainframe), cloud, and across hybrid cloud environments.

McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases automatically discovers databases on your network, determines if the latest patches have been applied, and tests for common weaknesses.

Offer
Learn more about IBM Guardium Data Protection
Learn more about McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm44%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company11%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise60%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise82%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Guardium Data Protection vs. McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
479,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Guardium Data Protection is ranked 2nd in Database Security with 8 reviews while McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases is ranked 5th in Database Security with 2 reviews. IBM Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.4, while McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Data Protection writes "Proven record of preventing unauthorized access and modifications to our customer's data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases writes "Very good support, easy to set up, and mostly stable". IBM Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Vormetric Application Crypto Suite and jSonar, whereas McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases is most compared with . See our IBM Guardium Data Protection vs. McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases report.

See our list of best Database Security vendors.

We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.