Compare IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy vs. Privitar Publisher

IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is ranked 13th in Data Masking while Privitar Publisher is ranked 15th in Data Masking. IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is rated 0, while Privitar Publisher is rated 0. On the other hand, IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy is most compared with IBM Guardium Data Protection, whereas Privitar Publisher is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
13th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
45
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
15th
out of 25 in Data Masking
Views
31
Comparisons
29
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Optim Data Privacy, Optim Data Privacy
Learn
IBM
Privitar
Overview

Optim Data Privacy supports Format Preserving Encryption (FPE) and is based on the Advanced Encryption Standard 256-bit (AES-256) algorithm providing the capability to produce unique masked values that are extremely varied and without a discernible pattern.

Delivering data-driven insights that fuel growth while achieving compliance for the sensitive data from your customers, partners and employees is hard, but it doesn’t have to be. With Privitar’s market-leading functionality and enterprise grade software, you can finally achieve both.

Offer
Learn more about IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy
Learn more about Privitar Publisher
Sample Customers
RabobankNHS Digital
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Broadcom, Delphix and others in Data Masking. Updated: May 2020.
419,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Masking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.