IBM Order-to-Cash BPO vs Infosys Order-to-Cash BPO comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
64
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
136
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

IBM's Equitant Order to Cash services empower Global 1000 corporations with the ability to improve and manage their order to cash cycle from start to finish. We collaborate with the corporation to build this capability from any starting point, whether that means the implementation of a full solution or a subset of processes, business units or locations.
Using our analytics-driven methodology along with IBM technology and analytics, we create a scalable, sustainable order to cash and accounts receivable infrastructure that helps to deliver significant improvements in operating costs and working capital.

Infosys provides end-to-end services through its global operating model for the Order-to-cash function. With Infosys BPO, you get a partner who drives your journey of process consolidation and harmonization, .automates your processes, manages your risk, helps you recognize revenue early, improve your day sales outstanding (DSO), and enhance your end-customer satisfaction.
Sample Customers
Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, Animas
Staples Brazil, Staples Brazil, P&G's Singapore Customer Service Center, Philips

IBM Order-to-Cash BPO is ranked 6th in Order-to-Cash BPO Providers while Infosys Order-to-Cash BPO is ranked 2nd in Order-to-Cash BPO Providers. IBM Order-to-Cash BPO is rated 0.0, while Infosys Order-to-Cash BPO is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM Order-to-Cash BPO is most compared with , whereas Infosys Order-to-Cash BPO is most compared with Wipro Order-to-Cash BPO.

See our list of best Order-to-Cash BPO Providers vendors.

We monitor all Order-to-Cash BPO Providers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.