• Home
  • IBM PureSystems vs. VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL]

IBM PureSystems vs VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo

IBM PureSystems

Read 2 IBM PureSystems reviews
62 views|54 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
VMware Logo

VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL]

Read 13 VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Converged Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM PureSystems and VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Converged Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
PureSystems, something old, something new, something from big blue
Anonymous User
We like having four built-in nodes. We lost one, but our load kept going. In future releases, I want to be able to...
The benefits of EVO:RAIL is the simple configuration, the scalability, so as we add VDI users. We are just planning to add more EVO:RAIL... Read more →
Comparison Review
Anonymous User
Nutanix vs. VMware EVO:RAIL vs. FlexPod
Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned and congruent to the organization’s data architecture and business plans. The announcement of Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant on Integrated Systems (read hyper convergence) has put Nutanix as the leader of the pack as of August 2015. Clearly, many of us get caught up because it is the “greatest feeling in the world”. However, this faux feeling is not reality because there are many factors that made the pack leaders in the Magic Quadrant (MQ). First of all, the MQ is about market perception. There is no doubt that the pack leaders in the Leaders Quadrant have earned their right to be there. Each company’s revenue, market share, gross margin, company’s profitability have helped put each as leaders in the pack. However, it is also measured by branding, marketing, market perception and acceptance and other intangible factors. Secondly, VMware EVO: Rail has split the market when EMC has 3 HC solutions in VCE, ScaleIO and EVO: Rail. Cisco wanted to do their own HC piece in Whiptail (between the 2014 MQ and 2015 MQ reports), and closed down Whiptail when their new CEO came on board. NetApp chose EVO: Rail and also has the ever popular FlexPod. That is why you see that in… Read more →
Ranking
12th
out of 14 in Converged Infrastructure
Views
62
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Converged Infrastructure
Buyer's Guide
Converged Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
PureSystems
EVO:RAIL
Learn More
IBM
VMware
Video Not Available
Overview

PureSystems is a simple, smart, integrated IT infrastructure that frees your hands and opens your vision to new possibilities.

VMware EVO:RAIL combines VMware compute, networking, and storage resources into a hyper-converged infrastructure appliance to create a simple, easy to deploy, all-in-one solution offered by Qualified EVO:RAIL Partners.
Sample Customers
ABT Online, Ascent Solutions Inc., Desert Research Institute (DRI), Reflexis, Esri, Avcilar Municipality, ValeCard, Computer Gross Italia S.p.A., DynaFront, Silvermoon Business Systems, Diasoft, BPTP, Temenos, Innovation Group, OneTree Solutions
ASAHI INTERACTIVE, Fukuoka-Hibiki Shinkin Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Agriculture14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Retailer14%
Media Company14%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise47%
Buyer's Guide
Converged Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM PureSystems is ranked 12th in Converged Infrastructure while VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Converged Infrastructure. IBM PureSystems is rated 8.0, while VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM PureSystems writes "PureSystems, something old, something new, something from big blue". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] writes "We like having four built-in nodes. We lost one, but our load kept going. In future releases, I want to be able to bring up appliances and different data centers with smooth replication". IBM PureSystems is most compared with Dell PowerEdge VRTX, whereas VMware EVO:RAIL [EOL] is most compared with .

We monitor all Converged Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.