Compare IBM QRadar vs. LogLogic

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 5 Devo reviews.
6,393 views|3,198 comparisons
IBM QRadar Logo
38,323 views|25,240 comparisons
LogLogic Logo
851 views|696 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use LogLogic? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Netsurion and others in Log Management. Updated: December 2020.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.""We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.""We have seen ROI. We have seen cost savings in maintenance, upkeep, and support.""I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money."

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is cheaper than ArcSight.""It's too expensive.""Licensing is very expensive, IBM QRadar is a very expensive solution. If you want to minimize costs then IBM QRadar is not for you.""The pricing is good.""I would like for them to lower the price.""IBM has subscriptions plans that run for one year.""QRadar is quite expensive. It wouldn't be worth it for a small business...""It's too expensive. The licensing is also a little bit difficult to understand because you have to license it per event and per number of flows."

More IBM QRadar Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of… more »
Top Answer: We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the… more »
Top Answer: There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the… more »
Top Answer: It mostly depends on your use-cases and environment. Exabeam and Securonix have a stronger UEBA feature set, friendlier… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 54% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 54% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
LogtrustQRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar
Learn
Devo
IBM
TIBCO
Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

The IBM QRadar security and analytics platform is a lead offering in IBM Security's portfolio. This family of products provides consolidated flexible architecture for security teams to quickly adopt log management, SIEM, user behavior analytics, incident forensics, and threat intelligence and more. As an integrated analytics platform, QRadar streamlines critical capabilities into a common workflow, with tools such as the IBM Security App Exchange ecosystem and Watson for Cyber Security cognitive capability.

With QRadar, you can decrease your overall cost of ownership with an improved detection of threats and enjoy the flexibility of on-premise or cloud deployment, and optional managed security monitoring services.

Log data isn't just for security anymore. Log and machine data is being harnessed to provide insight into IT operational efficiencies Ð and TIBCO LogLogic uses log and machine data as the fuel for improving Operational Intelligence.
Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about IBM QRadar
Learn more about LogLogic
Sample Customers
United States Air Force, Rubrik, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenTextClients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.Astrium, Cerner, Children's Hospital, Effiage, Lavego, Plantronics, Skipton Building Society, The Body Shop, The Lowry, University of Manitoba
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Transportation Company12%
Comms Service Provider7%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider24%
Media Company7%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government8%
Media Company8%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise38%
REVIEWERS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Netsurion and others in Log Management. Updated: December 2020.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM QRadar is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 39 reviews while LogLogic is ranked 32nd in Log Management. IBM QRadar is rated 8.0, while LogLogic is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM QRadar writes "Best price-performance ratio, good scalability, and easy to set up". On the other hand, IBM QRadar is most compared with Splunk, ELK Logstash, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) and RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM), whereas LogLogic is most compared with Splunk, ELK Logstash, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and Sumo Logic.

See our list of best Log Management vendors and best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.