Compare IBM QRadar vs. SevOne

IBM QRadar is ranked 3rd in Log Management with 31 reviews while SevOne is ranked 24th in Log Management. IBM QRadar is rated 8.2, while SevOne is rated 0. The top reviewer of IBM QRadar writes "Enables us to handle the most critical attacks and integrates well with other solutions". On the other hand, IBM QRadar is most compared with Splunk, ELK Logstash, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM, ArcSight and RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM), whereas SevOne is most compared with Splunk, SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, Gigamon and Netrounds.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 3 Devo reviews.
4,532 views|2,658 comparisons
IBM QRadar Logo
39,790 views|27,068 comparisons
SevOne Logo
4,180 views|2,859 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: July 2020.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

The pricing needs to be such that they are more competitive with other vendors.There are additional costs, such as the cost associated with the different hardware required for implementation and deployment. Along with the add-on apps, these are all additional costs, and they require licensing as well.In terms of additional costs, it depends on the subscription that you choose. There are plenty of options to choose from.Our licensing costs for this solution is on a yearly basis.It's too expensive. The licensing is also a little bit difficult to understand because you have to license it per event and per number of flows.QRadar is quite expensive. It wouldn't be worth it for a small business...I would like for them to lower the price.The pricing is good.

More IBM QRadar Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 60% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
LogtrustQRadar SIEM, QRadar UBA, QRadar on Cloud, QRadar
Learn
Devo
IBM
Turbonomic
Overview

Devo unlocks the full value of machine data for the world’s most instrumented enterprises by putting more data to work now. With Devo, IT executives finally realize the transformational promise of machine data to drive breakthrough projects that move the entire business forward.

The IBM QRadar security and analytics platform is a lead offering in IBM Security's portfolio. This family of products provides consolidated flexible architecture for security teams to quickly adopt log management, SIEM, user behavior analytics, incident forensics, and threat intelligence and more. As an integrated analytics platform, QRadar streamlines critical capabilities into a common workflow, with tools such as the IBM Security App Exchange ecosystem and Watson for Cyber Security cognitive capability.

With QRadar, you can decrease your overall cost of ownership with an improved detection of threats and enjoy the flexibility of on-premise or cloud deployment, and optional managed security monitoring services.

SevOne provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions that organizations need to monitor their networks today, tomorrow and beyond. SevOne simplifies the extraction and enrichment of metric, flow, and streaming telemetry data across multi-vendor networks enabling enterprises, carriers and managed services providers to ensure optimal network operations and performance.

SevOne provides SaaS, public cloud and on-prem offerings, including several pre-built solutions specifically designed to solve SD-WAN, SDN, NFV and enterprise Wi-Fi challenges. SevOne helps customers compete and win in the connected world by increasing their business agility and velocity of delivering new applications and services. SevOne is privately held and is headquartered in Boston, Mass. Follow SevOne on Twitter at @SevOneInc.

Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about IBM QRadar
Learn more about SevOne
Sample Customers
NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, Public Library of Science, OpenTextClients across multiple industries, such as energy, financial, retail, healthcare, government, communications, and education use QRadar.Adobe, Aflac, BT, Comcast, eBay, EA, Go Daddy, Liberty Global, Telstra, TMobile, Spark, Starhub, SKY, UBS
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm26%
Transportation Company14%
Health, Wellness And Fitness Company6%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company9%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider42%
Media Company16%
Government11%
University11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider20%
Healthcare Company7%
Non Profit4%
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, LogRhythm, IBM and others in Log Management. Updated: July 2020.
431,024 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.